To ASSURE good learning, I believe it is not one single thing that a
teacher or designer should consider, but I do believe that there are
areas of emphasis.
First, ASSURE starts with looking at the learner in detail.
Nothing you plan or design is effective unless you have taken the time
to look at the learners. That
means that by understanding where the learners are at the start of
instruction, a teacher will make every effort to assist all learners to
be successful in their learning endeavors. This new direction supports
my position about knowing the learner. I feel that knowing as much as
possible about your learners is critical to design and implementation of
instruction.'
Second, the second letter in ASSURE, S, refers to knowing the
intended outcomes or expectations. No instruction should begin without
everyone having a clear understanding of what is supposed to happen in
the instruction. This does not preclude the possibility of additional
learning taking place, but without a road map, some of your learners may
well be "lost." And, especially in the schools today, as we edge closer
to the 100% of all students meeting or exceeding expectations, I
believe that students need to know what is expected of them.
we need to
find ways to make it possible for our diverse learning population fit
into the "mold" that has been outlined for us. Learners need to know
what they are to do. And, I add that you cannot assess learning without
knowing what was expected.
My final area of importance in the design and implementation
process to ASSURE good learning is the reflection component of
evaluation. Once you have completed the design and instruction and
gathered the data about the outcomes and impressions from your learners,
you need to take the time to consider what went well and what could be
changed in that particular instructional event. This information will
help you re-design that instructional event for future opportunities.
But, this information also guides you on how to better address your
learners in instruction beyond this particular instructional event. We
often do not put enough emphasis on reflection as teachers and
designers, but I do consider that it is not time wasted.
from our group discussions, i have learnt many ideas; analysis of the learners is paramount, selection of teaching aids is very key to enhance retention and recall of the learnt material and among others the learners involvement from the start will help them to grasp every content and the assure model does not accommodate cram work since the learners are as much involved and they take their findings themselves with the teacher standing in a corner to force material into their heads.
Friday, 26 June 2015
Monday, 8 June 2015
3.6.4 ASSURE LESSON PLANS- ANALYSIS FIRST
Most teachers
understand that integrating technology into the curriculum is the best way to
make a positive difference in education. While many specific strategies can be
used to add technology to the mix, the following model is one example of how to
integrate technology into future
lessons.
The ASSURE
model was developed by Heinich, Molenda, Russell, Smaldino (1999) and is an
instructional model for planning a lesson and the technology that will enhance
it. The ASSURE model contains six steps and the letters in ASSURE form an
acronym. The “A” stands for Analyze
the learner. Who are my students? While this seems to be common
sense, the step is important to mention because keeping a class of students in
mind will help ensure that I work diligently to find those materials and
resources that will be most appropriate and useful to my students. I should
know who my students are (e. g. demographics, prior knowledge, learning
styles, academic abilities) on a multitude of levels, and use this knowledge in
every lesson I really plan. http://ed205.net/assure_model.html
General characteristics - grade, age, ethnic group, sex, mental, emotional, physical, or social problems, socioeconomic level, and so on.
Specific entry competencies - prior knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
Learning styles - verbal, logical, visual, musical, structured, and so on. http://www.myteacherpages.com/webpages/mkiva/university.cfm?subpage=1114844
This lesson of analyzing the learners has answered
many questions that occupied my mind
v
What are
stable and changing similarities and differences among learners?
v
What are the
categories of cognitive characteristics that should be considered in designing
instruction?
v
What is the
difference between general characteristics and specific prior knowledge of a
learner population?
v
What are some
instructional strategy variables that may be influenced by learner
characteristics?
v
How can
different learner characteristics influence how the variables are implemented?
v
How can i
identify sources of information about learner characteristics of a particular
audience?
v
What are some
examples of learner characteristics?
v
What are some
techniques and procedures that can be used to identify learner characteristics
when designing instruction?
While we are analyzing the
learners we need to clearly capture their; sensory capacities: these include
observing and modeling their behaviors
We also need to know that
the learners have big differences in terms of intelligent quotient. Intelligent
quotient will help the teacher to know whether to give a number of examples,
the learners ability to interpret concepts, whether to increase on duration,
how much practice is needed for the trainees, their attitude towards learning
and the amount of prior knowledge. Off course the IQ helps us to understand the
attention span of the learners.
I also have learnt that
the gender, ethnicity and racial information are very important. This will help
me understand and learners experiences, cultural factors and how to manage
their groups.
Understanding the
psychosocial traits of learners helps us to capture learner’s anxiety and
performances in particular settings.
Specific prior learning
is considered to be the most significant factor when designing a lesson simply because
it allows the teacher to set objectives that will not bore the trainees and off
course will realize many opportunities towards using and instruction technique.
I have learnt that I have
to gather information from the trainees in the following categories as well.
Specific prior knowledge,
Psychological characteristics, Cognitive characteristics
http://www.angelfire.com/la2/learners/learners.html
and have concurred with the educators on the mentioned link.
The site above also
explains clearly the purpose of conducting the learner analysis. I have learnt
that it helps the teacher to manage the class effectively if he or she understands
the weaknesses, challenges and strengths of the learner.
NIWAMANYA GILBERT
A/g Head of Plumbing and Sheetmetal Department
Nakawa Vocational Training Institute-Uganda
+256 (0) 774 228 871
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)